از حذف رزم‌آرا تا ملی شدن نفت | قسمت دوم گفتگوی شهرام اتفاق و کوروش احمدی

In the second part of the conversation, Kourosh Ahmadi argues that the assassination of Razm‑Ara had no impact on the nationalization of Iran’s oil. He explains that Parliament had a two‑month window to adjust the contract with the British company to a 50‑50 split, and that rumors of Razm‑Ara’s involvement were false. Ahmadi cites the British ambassador’s conversation with Hossein Alaei before nationalization and notes that even if Razm‑Ara had not been assassinated, Parliament would have voted for nationalization. Shahram Etegh adds that Razm‑Ara had reached a 50‑50 agreement with the British but could not publicize it because negotiating with the West was taboo at the time. He recounts Razm‑Ara’s assassination by Khalil Tahmasbi and the subsequent presentation of the nationalization plan to Parliament. Etegh also points out that the National Front and Mosaddegh’s supporters were aware of the 50‑50 agreement, yet the nationalization project was a political move toward Mosaddegh’s power, and that the Islamic Defenders and the National Front had close ties during that period.