توافق با آمریکا، تخاصم با اسرائیل؟ | گفتگوی علی واعظ و مجید شاکری - قسمت دوم

In the second part of the discussion, Ali Waez argues that Iran bears the cost of a nuclear confrontation without reaping benefits, proposing a phased suspension of enrichment, war, and trigger mechanisms, followed by a long‑term nuclear plan that includes a commitment not to launch a direct attack on Israel. He stresses that any agreement with the United States must address the Israel issue, and that President Trump seeks to showcase negotiation success while also securing congressional approval. Majid Shakri counters that a purely legal approach will not resolve the issue, warning that a future war with Israel would be more severe. He presents a practical solution that aligns with U.S. interests, suggesting that the revenue from an oil program would be more valuable than preventing an Israeli attack on Iran, and notes that temporary sanctions relief, as seen in Syria, is not a viable long‑term strategy. The conversation highlights differing views on how Iran should navigate nuclear negotiations and its relationship with Israel and the United States.