توافق با آمریکا، تخاصم با اسرائیل؟ | گفتگوی علی واعظ و مجید شاکری - قسمت دوم

In the second part of the discussion, Ali Vaez argues that Iran bears the cost of a nuclear confrontation without reaping benefits, proposing a phased suspension of enrichment, war, and trigger mechanisms, coupled with a long‑term plan that includes a commitment not to attack Israel. He stresses that any U.S. agreement must address the Israel issue and that Trump’s success in negotiations should be validated by Congress. Majid Shakri counters that a purely legal approach will not resolve the conflict, warning that a future war with Israel would be more severe. He presents a practical solution that aligns with U.S. interests, suggesting that suspending Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for a profitable oil deal would be more valuable than preventing an Israeli attack on Iran, and notes that lifting sanctions is unlikely to be fully achieved.