WAQF Argument Day 02 ; Insight in simple terms | Face to Face

The Centre urged the Supreme Court to pass an interim order restricting the hearing on petitions challenging the validity of the Wakf (Amendment) Act to three issues, including the boards' right to de-notify wakf properties declared by the court, user and deed. Senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for petitioners challenging the constitutionality of the Wakf (Amendment) Act, opposed the Centre's argument and said important legislation cannot be heard in a piecemeal manner.