Арестович: Зеленский согласится на план Трампа? Что означают 28 пунктов? #украина #россия #путин

00:00 The video opens with an overview of the U.S. peace plan consisting of 28 points and discusses the likelihood of President Zelensky signing it before November 27, as well as the potential for a second Ovanov cabinet. 05:15 The host questions whether Yermak should be dismissed following the corruption scandal known as Mindičgate. 08:08 Ukrainian politicians' priorities are examined, focusing on what Petro Poroshenko expects. 09:40 The discussion turns to the war being beyond the purview of any single Ukrainian political office, not just the presidential office. 10:53 The possibility of Ukrainian military ultimatums to Zelensky is considered. 17:00 The video asks whether Alexei would sign the 28-point peace plan. 19:35 Mindičgate is portrayed as a surrender of Ukraine to Russia and the U.S. 23:23 The narrative claims that the U.S. accepted the plan to grant amnesty to Zelensky's administration. 24:50 Russia's security in the U.S. peace plan is analyzed. 26:32 The role of the National Security and Intelligence Service (NIS) and the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) as leftist globalist creations is discussed. 29:10 Mindičgate is described as a pre‑planned strategy to get Zelensky to sign the U.S. plan, labeled as cynical politics. 31:44 The host accuses the Ukrainian government of cannibalism, arguing that Zelensky cannot be the sole culprit and questioning whether he will be ousted like Sahaqashvili. 36:20 The potential for public outrage in Ukraine is explored. 40:08 The video critiques the theft of money from the blood of the people, the involvement of presidents in criminal schemes, and the lack of legal wallets. 48:20 A scheme involving 'Fire Point' and the Ukrainian missile manufacturer Flamingo is presented, suggesting that Zelensky will be absolved if he pursues U.S. policy goals. 54:40 The narrative claims that theft weakens Ukraine's ability to resist Putin, framing a deal where Ukrainians steal but do not surrender to Trump or seek revenge against Putin. 59:20 The video asserts that real people, not bots, support Zelensky, and that Zaluzhny is a more effective Zelensky. 01:02:52 European perspectives on the embezzlement of funds and their support for protecting European interests rather than Zelensky are discussed, with a ten‑year defense planning horizon. 01:14:30 Historical anti‑Russian accounts of Baltic states are mentioned, linking the war in Ukraine to political calculations by other countries. 01:18:13 U.S. objectives to win a historical confrontation with China through resource concentration are outlined. 01:20:10 Russia is described as no longer controllable, with Trump negotiating manageability. 01:22:25 The positions of the EU, UK, and U.S. are aligned, criticizing Zelensky's inefficiency and calling for increased Ukrainian effectiveness, while Trump wants to put Russia in its place. 01:26:42 The video claims that only right‑wing forces are fighting, and that the U.S. peace plan prevents Russia from winning. 01:29:45 Fronts in Pokrovsk, Huliaipole, and Kupiansk are discussed as distractions. 01:34:36 Ukraine is portrayed as having the freedom to refuse integration into Russia, with Putin attempting to shame globalists. 01:44:48 The host apologizes to Ukrainians for harsh words and asserts that no other ideological model exists besides his.