800 миллиардов для Зеленского: ультиматум или отчаяние? - Щелин и Латынина

At 0:00 the speaker opens with a discussion on the rationality of a "дикарь" and the logic of a shaman. By 4:47 he outlines four lines—infrastructure, media, economy—before moving on to the Soviet resilience and security trap at 8:14. At 12:40 he critiques Western support limits, and at 16:42 he argues that Zelensky saves the situation through media logic. The 21:49 segment examines Zelensky's success in staying in power, while 25:15 frames Ukraine as a private military company against Russia. At 29:45 he claims that "humanists" have prolonged the war and losses, and 33:12 he discusses the illusion of Russia's collapse and sanctions. The 37:55 portion introduces aggressive attrition as a goal for the army, followed by 41:48 on "busification" as a marker of exhaustion. At 45:03 he touches on magical thinking and shamanic striking, and 48:58 he argues that political goals outweigh war methods. The 54:18 segment presents two US scenarios—1991 and 1973—while 59:09 uses Yugoslavia as an imprint template. At 1:03:52 he mentions an "open-key conspiracy", and 1:10:24 he points out errors in axioms rather than facts. The 1:13:46 part discusses anti‑Russia sentiment and dehumanization of "own", and 1:15:23 covers how modern technologies accelerate national construction. At 1:20:18 he claims Lenin channels nationalism for the USSR, and 1:23:08 he describes the nation as a technology and construct. The 1:26:20 segment outlines four levels: tribe, kingdom, empire. At 1:30:24 he says Ukraine lacks an operator and is changing hands, while 1:35:12 he calls for a return to Trump and Davos. The 1:37:47 part explains why Zelensky receives applause while Trump does not. At 1:41:12 he compares Canada in the 60s to another civilization, and 1:44:31 discusses the West building a tower and debating methods. The 1:49:05 segment references Asimov's psychohistory and "Foundation", and 1:52:08 he talks about self‑fulfilling prophecy and fears. At 1:55:18 he notes that everyone wants peace but speaks different languages, and 1:57:11 he discusses the collapse of the common WWII myth. The 2:01:59 part argues there is no common denominator for agreements, while 2:04:11 frames war as revelation and reality test. At 2:07:52 he contrasts tragedy with the myth of light and darkness, and 2:10:14 concludes the conversation with a farewell.