Why Mohak Mangal LOST & ANI WON | ₹50 Lakh Copyright Strike, Fair Use Myth & YouTube Laws Exposed

Description:

Why Mohak Mangal LOST & ANI WON | ₹50 Lakh Copyright Strike | ANI vs Creators | YouTube Fair Use India What happens when a content creator challenges a government-favoured news giant? He loses. This is the story of how ANI slapped ₹50 lakh worth of copyright strikes on Mohak Mangal, and how India's laws, courts and platforms silently watched him fall. 👎 Mohak didn’t lose because he was wrong. He lost because India’s fair dealing laws are broken, and YouTube’s copyright system is tilted towards corporations like ANI. 🔥 In this video: – Why ANI filed a defamation suit and took Mohak to Delhi High Court – How YouTube’s Content ID allowed ANI to block Mohak’s videos – What exactly is “Fair Use” vs “Fair Dealing”, and why India offers no protection – Why 9 seconds of footage can cost ₹50 lakh – International cases: H3H3 vs Matt Hoss, Lenz vs Universal, and YouTube US lawsuits – What Indian creators must know to protect themselves from copyright trolls 🧾 Referenced Laws & Policies: – Indian Copyright Act, Section 52 – YouTube’s 3-strike policy – Delhi High Court observations on ‘disparagement’ – US case laws that support creators (but not in India) 💡 Key Learnings: ✔ YouTube favours rights holders, not creators ✔ Fair Use ≠ Fair Dealing ✔ Even a second of footage can get your video blocked ✔ No clarity in Indian law = abuse of power ✔ Legal costs alone can silence you ⏱️ Chapters (with Timecodes): 0:00 – The Real Threat of Copyright Strikes Copyright was meant to protect creators, but now it’s being weaponized to silence them. 0:14 – How YouTube’s System Favors Corporates Explaining Content ID, manual strikes, and how ANI manipulates the process to attack creators. 0:50 – The Strike Trap: How Channels Are Silently Killed Agencies wait and then strike 3 times in one day — YouTube deletes the channel automatically. 1:22 – YouTube's Official Stand: Just a Platform? YouTube claims it only provides tools, but creators get punished instantly without fair hearing. 2:17 – What the Law Says: Fair Dealing vs Fair Use Section 52 of the Copyright Act explained — and why it fails to protect creators in reality. 3:39 – Psychological & Financial Impact on Creators Strikes don't just affect videos, they destroy livelihoods, mental health and kill free speech. 5:18 – Global Precedents: How US Courts Protect Creators The H3H3 case vs India’s legal vacuum — why Mohak had no chance against ANI. 6:48 – The Solutions We Need Now Fair dealing clarity, platform accountability, legal reform — and how creators can fight back. 📈 Trending Keywords Used: Mohak Mangal ANI, ANI copyright strike, YouTube India copyright 2025, Mohak Mangal defamation, fair use vs fair dealing, copyright abuse YouTube, ₹50 lakh copyright strike, Content ID YouTube India, Delhi High Court ANI order, ANI copyright scam, how copyright works on YouTube, creator rights India, YouTube strike scam, fair use laws India, legal strike for 9 seconds clip, copyright extortion India 📌 Subscribe if you’re a creator — this can happen to you. 📲 Follow us on Instagram for more updates. 👊 Share this video if you care about creator freedom. 💬 Comment below — should ANI be held accountable? #MohakMangal #ANI #CopyrightStrike #YouTubeIndia #FairUse #ContentID #DigitalCensorship #CreatorRights #NoNonsense #YouTubePolicy